Opinions on 59 or 60 Convertible top mechanisms

[Guest]

Hi Guys

As you might know I've been looking for a decent convertible for a while now and I'd like your opinions on the pros and cons of the earlier soft top mechanisms compared to the fully automatic system on the 60 model.

In my opinion simple is always better than complex however if things are still working after 50 plus years it must say something about the engineering involved. I had my last convertible for 12 years and it had a totally manual top which was very rarely up. It was a simple system and nothing ever went wrong with it. This is a new ball game for me.

I've read quite a bit about the two systems but that doesn't tell me much about owner's actual experiences and so I'd appreciate your ideas.

Mark

[jopizz]

I've had quite a few of both types and the 58-59 mechanism is my choice by far. In this case simpler is better.

John

[Restifier52]

Hi Mark. When I decided to get a Squarebird I did not consider a convertible. The complexity of the system was too much for me to imagine dealing with. So sorry I can't give you any input but I just wanted to say hi.

Rick

[lawyercalif]

The 1959 is simpler and easier to maintain. I do not find having to lift the trunk lid to be a problem. However since I live in California I keep the top down most of the time.

[partsetal]

I had a 60 that was full of surprises and a real pain. I now have an original 60 and the top works flawlessly every time, a true marvel to behold. The 59 is not as entertaining to watch, but it is simple and also reliable.
Carl

[dgs]

Personally, I like the wow factor of the '60, but there is a bit less to go wrong. Then again, it's the same technology, just more of it.

I've had a few issues with mine, but none were too hard to fix. Most were due to errors either my own or the mechanic that serviced it when my grandfather owned it.

I've been told that they are quite reliable if exercised regularly, something I hadn't been doing.