This will take you to the main site where there is history, technical information and other information on these cars.
This takes you back to the main page of the forums.
This is the control panel to change your password, information and preferences on this message board.
Click here if your lost your password or need to register on this message board. You must be a registered user to post. Registration is free.
Search this board for information you need.
Click here to buy cool Squarebirds mechandise.
Click here to support Squarebirds.org. For $20 annually receive 20mBytes webspace, a Squarebirds e-mail address and member's icon on the message board.
  #1  
Old 12-21-2004, 10:11 PM
1960Bird 1960Bird is offline
Experienced
 
Join Date: Dec 4 2002
Posts: 159
1960Bird is on a distinguished road
Default Three Inch Drums

Does anyone know if the front brakes, (3" shoes,drums and pistons etc.) from the Bulletbirds will fit on the squarebird front spindles?


Steve

1960 HT 390, Edelbrock Performer RPM Intake, Shorty Headers, 2-1/2" Exhaust and 3.70 Rear Gears
__________________
390, Mild Cam, Headers, 3.70 rear, 2-1/2" Exhaust, Edelbrok Performer RPM Intake, Holley Street Avenger 670 Carburetor, One Wire Alt, Petronix Ignition. She's All Go and No Show.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-22-2004, 08:18 AM
1rancher 1rancher is offline
Apprentice
 
Join Date: Sep 10 2003
Posts: 79
1rancher is on a distinguished road
Default RE: Three Inch Drums

HI
I read an article about the 1959 thunderbird nascar entry about 5 or more years ago where one of the modifications holoman / moody had done was to use spindles and brakes off a lincoln which had the 3 inch brakes. So as a guess i would say yes and that might be where the bullet birds get their brakes, (ford saving money). If anyone on this site has a list of the mods done to these cars i would sure enjoy seeing it posted. I have searched the net in the past but could not find a detailed list of the mods. I also read in the same article that durring that year one of the thunderbirds came out of the race due to frontend problems.
good luck
mark...1960 thunderbird conv.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-23-2004, 09:14 AM
flynbrian48 flynbrian48 is offline
Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 9 2004
Posts: 31
flynbrian48
Default RE: Three Inch Drums

Hi Steve,

As easy and cheap as it was to put the late 70's spindles/disk brakes on my '59, I'd think that'd be a better swap than the drums. Given that it seems the ball joints seem to be the same on all these, you could probably, if you have them, simply swap out the spindles and all if you're set on using the 3" drums.

How does your modified 390 pull the 'Bird? I was a bit dissapointed with the 5.0 HO I put in mine. It's a bit lacking in the torque department. I guess I discounted the add'l weight of the 'Bird as opposed to the 87 Mustang GT the engine originally powered! I didn't think it'd be that much heavier, but, it's still probably almost half a ton more. Steeper gears would help me, as I have the AOD trans.

I'd originally planned on a supercharger for the 5.0, but other projects have sidelined hot rodding this engine.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-23-2004, 10:07 AM
1rancher 1rancher is offline
Apprentice
 
Join Date: Sep 10 2003
Posts: 79
1rancher is on a distinguished road
Default RE: Three Inch Drums

hi
Brian, what kind of milage are you getting with that transmission?
thanks,
mark
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-23-2004, 11:18 AM
1960Bird 1960Bird is offline
Experienced
 
Join Date: Dec 4 2002
Posts: 159
1960Bird is on a distinguished road
Default RE: Three Inch Drums

The car pulls pretty good, if it is running good, I have some carb issues yet to be corrected) The engine is a a 1961 block and heads, it also has a mild cam along with the rest of the stuff I have listed. She will spin the tires pretty easily, although, if I had a C-6 rather then my old "Cruise O" it would be a lot better, I really need about a 2200 RPM torque converter to get the power down. As they used to say "HP sells cars...torque wins races" The big blocks have the torque that is for sure. I would guess that my new engine has about 325 actual HP and around 425 ft. lbs torque.

As for the brake switch over...I already have everything to do a 11 inch Granada disc switch, except a good proportioning valve. Being very lazy...I thought if I could just go to the bigger drums/shoes it would be a lot easier job. I estimated that I would pick up about 20% more front brake shoe surface area. If the 3' brakes stopped the 4400 pound Bulletbirds OK they should stop my old Squarebird on a dime.



Steve

1960 HT 390, Edelbrock Performer RPM Intake, Shorty Headers, 2-1/2" Exhaust and 3.70 Rear Gears
__________________
390, Mild Cam, Headers, 3.70 rear, 2-1/2" Exhaust, Edelbrok Performer RPM Intake, Holley Street Avenger 670 Carburetor, One Wire Alt, Petronix Ignition. She's All Go and No Show.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-23-2004, 01:06 PM
flynbrian48 flynbrian48 is offline
Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 9 2004
Posts: 31
flynbrian48
Default RE: Three Inch Drums

Hi guys,

As lazy mans swaps go, the disk brake spindle swap is super easy. The only snag I ran into changing to the T'Bird/Cougar disks wasn't the spindles at all, but the power brake booster I had didn't fit! Thanks to some great advice here, I'm now the owner of a Granada booster/master, and I'm home free. It's a no brainer to swap the spindles, however I will have to have the front end aligned, which it needed anyway.

I get 15-18 mpg with the 5.0 and AOD. I'm hoping to improve that since I elimated the catalyic converters from the H pipe. I'm running the Mustang dual exhaust, stainless steel, from the donor car complete with VERY quiet mufflers, and those too are headed for the scrap bin. I have had several Fox bodied Mustang 5.0 cars, and they all would get low 20's mpg. I am blaming the 'Birds extra weight for that too. Not that I really care what kind of milage it gets, but it's too quiet, and it might feel a little quicker.

I'm a big fan of the Edelbrock carb. I'm running a 750 cfm, elec. choke one on a built 455 in my '68 Pontiac Catlina convert, and a 650 in my Chris Craft runabout with a 327. Both ran GREAT right out of the box, look good, and have provided 3 seasons of instant starts and trouble free performance in both. They are less expensive than having a stock, 40 year old carb rebuilt. I've never had good luck rebuilding a carb, these seem to be idiot proof. The Catalina, by the way, with that heavily modified, big cammed, ported head 455 gets 26 mpg on the highway, and will flatten your eyeballs in their sockets! Wicked good fun!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-23-2004, 12:51 PM
1960Bird 1960Bird is offline
Experienced
 
Join Date: Dec 4 2002
Posts: 159
1960Bird is on a distinguished road
Default RE: Brian Three Inch Drums

I got to thinking about your car after my last post. Assuming that you are looking for more performance.
Since you have a 302 with AOD why not switch your rear end to a 4.11. That would give you some get up and go plus take advantage of you 302 engines higher RPM's capabilities. With the AOD you would still be OK for highway driving. JMHO

Steve

1960 HT 390, Edelbrock Performer RPM Intake, Shorty Headers, 2-1/2" Exhaust and 3.70 Rear Gears
__________________
390, Mild Cam, Headers, 3.70 rear, 2-1/2" Exhaust, Edelbrok Performer RPM Intake, Holley Street Avenger 670 Carburetor, One Wire Alt, Petronix Ignition. She's All Go and No Show.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:04 PM.

Driving, racing or working on cars can be hazardous. The procedures and advice on this website including the message board are opinion only. Squarebirds.org and its webmasters and contributors do not guarantee the correctness of the advice and procedures. The Squarebirds.org and its webmasters assume no liability for any damage, fines, punishment, injury or death resulting from following these procedures or advice. If you do not have the skills or tools to repair your car, please consult a professional. By using this site you agree to hold harmless the Squarebirds.org, its authors and its webmasters from any resulting claim and costs that may occur from using the information found on this site.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Any submissions to this site and any post on this site becomes property of Squarebirds.org . The webmasters reserve the right to edit and modify any submissions to this site. All material on this is site is copyrighted by the Squarebirds.org. Reproduction by any means other than for personal use is strictly prohibited. Permission to use material on this site can be obtained by contacting the webmasters. Copyright 2002-2016 by Squarebirds.org.