Squarebirds, Rocketbirds, and Fifties/Sixties Ford Discussion Forum

Squarebirds, Rocketbirds, and Fifties/Sixties Ford Discussion Forum (http://squarebirds.org/vbulletin/index.php)
-   1958 To 1960 Squarebirds - General Technical Discussion (http://squarebirds.org/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Driver shaft length with C6 (http://squarebirds.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=21837)

SirBB 08-08-2017 12:13 PM

Driver shaft length with C6
 
Hi Guys, I went to replace the tail shaft bushing and seal on my 1960 with 352 or 390 (im still not sure) and realized the joke was only engaged into the bushing ~ 1/4". Amazing it held together, I could kick the guy who did this.

looking at the diagram and comments on other posts it looks like the original shaft should be 52", but I assume this was with the crus-o-matic, not with a C6. Does anyone have a dimension of what it should be for a C6?

My shaft measures 47 3/4" so I think a 52" would be good. I had 5 1/4" of joke exposed before removing the shaft.

Any thoughts?

jopizz 08-08-2017 12:41 PM

All Squarebirds had a 52" driveshaft and a 7 5/16" yolk. 1966 Thunderbirds that had a C6 used a 51 5/8" driveshaft and a 7 1/2" yolk. If 52" is a little too long then use a shorter yolk.

John

OX1 08-08-2017 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jopizz (Post 110144)
All Squarebirds had a 52" driveshaft and a 7 5/16" yolk. 1966 Thunderbirds that had a C6 used a 51 5/8" driveshaft and a 7 1/2" yolk. If 52" is a little too long then use a shorter yolk.

John

All with the 352??

http://www.squarebirds.org/vbulletin...ght=driveshaft

jopizz 08-08-2017 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OX1 (Post 110146)

The parts book doesn't show the length for the 430 drive shaft for some reason. It does have a different part number so I suspect it's not 52". I imagine 49" as it says in the thread you reference is close to correct.

John

OX1 08-09-2017 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jopizz (Post 110151)
The parts book doesn't show the length for the 430 drive shaft for some reason. It does have a different part number so I suspect it's not 52". I imagine 49" as it says in the thread you reference is close to correct.

John

Maybe that thread should be transferred somehow to TechnicalResourceLibrary, currently nothing in there about driveshafts............

Or give me all the data and any pics you have besides mine and I will write up a tech reference for it.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Any submissions to this site and any post on this site becomes property of Squarebirds.org . The webmasters reserve the right to edit and modify any submissions to this site. All material on this is site is copyrighted by the Squarebirds.org. Reproduction by any means other than for personal use is strictly prohibited. Permission to use material on this site can be obtained by contacting the webmasters. Copyright 2002-2016 by Squarebirds.org.